Fischer: Infrastructure Investments Pay Dividends for Nebraska

Read the full piece from Senator Fischer on yorknewstimes.com

In his 1954 State of the Union address, President Dwight D. Eisenhower announced his intention to “protect the vital interest of every citizen in a safe and adequate highway system.” Eisenhower claimed that the U.S. government must play central role in this task, advocating federal funding for an Interstate Highway System.

Establishing this system was no simple feat. The Senate rejected President Eisenhower’s initial proposal, which relied on state and local governments to contribute most of the Interstate’s cost. Lawmakers believed that more federal funding should address the safety risks of the 1950s roads system. The House of Representatives also rejected the initial proposal, instead creating a fund that drew on the gas tax to support construction of the highway system. Two years later, the Senate and House reconciled their versions of the Federal-Aid Highway Act, and President Eisenhower signed the final version into law. That law joined disparate roads into the connected Interstate we drive on today.

Several decades later, Congress still recognizes the federal government’s irreplaceable role in maintaining and modernizing our country’s infrastructure. And while the media may focus on divisive and controversial issues, many of us in the Senate and House still work together to accomplish good on behalf of the American people. One of the best examples is infrastructure.

In 2021, I joined many of my colleagues from both parties in supporting the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill. This legislation invests in our national infrastructure to ensure safety, connect communities, and grow local economies on a national scale. It funds core infrastructure from airports to broadband to roads and bridges. As we crafted the bill, my colleagues and I negotiated funding to be directed to Nebraska specifically. To date, Nebraska has received $2.4 billion for various infrastructure products, including $1.4 billion for roads and bridges and $174 million for clean water.

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill has also provided grants to airports across our state, in Omaha, North Platte, Grand Island, Kearney, Kimball, and Western Nebraska. This week, I spoke at the groundbreaking ceremony of Eppley Airfield’s “Build OMA” Terminal Modernization Program, a project funded in part by those federal grants. The Build OMA program will meet the demands of increasing traffic at Nebraska’s premiere airport. It will nearly double the terminal in size and build several first-rate amenities: an updated entrance, centralized security, expanded gates, and larger waiting areas. I also secured funding for a new Customs and Border Protection facility that will allow families and products to travel internationally, directly from Omaha. This comprehensive overhaul will ensure Eppley remains a modern, world-class airport that Nebraskans can be proud of for years to come.

The groundbreaking followed the announcement of a new $3 million federal grant to support terminal improvements at Eppley, as well as a $7 million grant for the North Platte Airport Authority to construct a replacement terminal building, among other projects. Three years on, Bipartisan Infrastructure Law is still paying dividends to Nebraska for transportation and infrastructure updates like the Build OMA project. To date, that legislation has granted more than $50 million to upgrade and modernize Eppley.

The Build OMA program at Eppley is a perfect example of the sweeping improvements infrastructure legislation can fund. As long as Congress can continue to do the hard but quiet work of true legislating, our state will only see more projects like these in the future. I’ll keep doing my part in the Senate to support improvements that serve Nebraska families and make our Good Life even better.

Thank you for participating in the democratic process. I look forward to visiting with you again next week.

Rural Radio: U.S. Sen. Fischer Earns Nebraska Farm Bureau Endorsement

Read the full news release on ruralradio.com

LINCOLN, NEB. – U.S. Sen. Deb Fischer has earned the endorsement of the Nebraska Farm Bureau Policitcal Action Committee (NEFB-PAC). Fischer, who is seeking reelection to the U.S. Senate, received the endorsement based on her tireless work on several policy issues of high priority to Nebraska farm and ranch families, according to Nebraska Farm Bureau (NEFB) President Mark McHargue.

“Sen. Fischer truly understands the needs of farmers and ranchers and has worked on several key issues of interest to our members. As a member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, Sen. Fischer gives Nebraska a top spot on the main committee focused on the many issues facing farm and ranch families. We are excited to provide our support as she seeks re-election,” said Mark McHargue, NEFB president.

Sen. Fischer has a proven track record of working for agriculture and Nebraska’s rural communities. She helped lead the passage of the 2018 Farm Bill and continues to work on the next Farm Bill. Sen. Fischer has been agriculture’s champion in the fight to reduce the regulatory burdens on farmers and ranchers, protect livestock producers from burdensome air emission reporting requirements, and ensure year-round access to E-15 ethanol.

“We are also thankful to Sen. Fischer for her continued push to provide support for precision agriculture and her commitment to secure funding for the National Center for Resilient and Regenerative Precision Agriculture research center at Nebraska Innovation Campus. The implementation of precision technologies by farmers and ranchers will result in a more sustainable future for our country’s food producers, both in terms of the environment and the economy.  Her work on the Senate Appropriations Committee has helped place Nebraska as a global frontrunner in agricultural research,” said McHargue.

Sen. Fischer led the way in working to update cattle marketing regulations and continues to defend Nebraska growers’ access to markets around the world by advocating for trade deals which benefit agriculture. She also remains a steadfast supporter of updating our nation’s transportation and broadband infrastructure including supporting a package that provided needed funding for roads, bridges, and dams, $405 million in broadband funding for Nebraska, and offered a significant regulatory Hours of Service change for livestock and insect haulers.

“Sen. Fischer has proven herself to be an advocate for agriculture and we appreciate her ongoing efforts to serve Nebraska’s farm and ranch families. We look forward to continuing working with Sen. Fischer to enhance Nebraska agriculture and enrich the lives of all Nebraskans,” said McHargue.

Sen. Fischer earned the NEFB-PAC endorsement based on results of NEFB’s grassroots selection process, which involves gathering input from local County Farm Bureaus across the state.

‘Economic engine of the state of Nebraska’: Nebraska Farm Bureau endorses Sen. Deb Fischer

Read the full article on ketv.com by Maddie Augustine

The Nebraska Farm Bureau gives its endorsements for the House and Senate Saturday.

The organization is backing all of the state’s incumbents, including Rep. Don Bacon, Mike Flood and Adrian Smith and Sens. Pete Ricketts and Deb Fischer.

In an exclusive interview with KETV, Fischer said there are a number of things she hopes to address over the course of this year and if she gets reelected. Several involve the agriculture industry, which the senator says is part of why the endorsement from the Farm Bureau is important.

“Farm Bureau is a great example of stakeholders who get involved with legislation, not just on the national level, but on the state level as well,” Fischer said.

With the official endorsement, the Nebraska Farm Bureau said the senator has proven she understands the needs of Nebraskans and can get the work done in Washington.

“The fact that she understands agriculture and just because someone is from Nebraska doesn’t necessarily mean they understand agriculture, so growing up and running a working ranch, she certainly understands that,” Mark McHargue, president of Nebraska Farm Bureau, said.

One key topic of discussion is the push to pass the 2024 Farm Bill.

“We need a safety net for farmers,” McHargue said. “And so when we think about farmers and ranchers providing their food for the world, it’s really important that they have the ability to consistently produce a product that is supposed to safe, efficient and abundant. And so the farm bill does that.”

Fischer agreed.

“I feel pretty confident that we’re going to be able to move ahead and get a good farm bill done,” Fischer said.

For Fischer, another focus area is improving agricultural trade for Nebraskans. According to a study from Creighton University, Nebraska saw a 35.5% decline from 2022 to 2023 in agricultural exports.

“We need to really push forward on trade,” Fischer said. “And I’m going to continue to push the Biden administration to step up and start doing it.”

But one of Fischer’s largest concerns, the impact of inflation.

“That hurts every family in Nebraska,” Fischer said. “Inflation is concerning everybody from from a mom of a preschooler in Lincoln to to a farmer out in Greeley counties. So that that’s the number one issue across the state.”

Especially the impact on farmers and ranchers as the input costs continue to rise but not necessarily the commodity price.

“If you’re selling a bushel of corn or if you’re selling a steer, if it’s, if that doesn’t go up, you can’t you can’t afford to stay in business,” Fischer said. “You can’t put a price tag on a steer. You have to take the price that’s offered. You can’t put a price tag on a bushel of corn. As a farmer, you have to take the commodity price. What it is trading on the board that day.”

Fischer said if re-elected, she will continue to fight for farmers and ranchers.

“Agriculture is the economic engine of the state of Nebraska,” Fischer said. “When agriculture does well, the state of Nebraska does well.”

Union president and military veteran Dan Osborn is running as an independent against Fischer.

Voters will make their decision this November.

BREITBART: Sen. Deb Fischer of Nebraska Announces Opposition to Lankford Immigration Plan

Read the full article on breitbart.com by Sean Moran

Fischer, a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said in a written statement, “Americans want Congress to pass legislation that secures the border to keep our nation safe. This bill falls short of that obligation. I cannot vote for a bill that funds the security of other nations while leaving our own border security in jeopardy.”

The Senate border bill aims to curb the migrant crisis at America’s southern border, but skeptics believe that it would do little to accomplish that goal.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, for instance, praised the bill for preserving the Biden administration’s parole pipeline that has freed hundreds of thousands of border crossers into American communities.

The bill would also expedite Biden’s work permits for border crossers and illegal aliens released into the United States.

Like Sen. Fischer, Republicans across the spectrum have said they oppose the bill.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said, “This bill is even worse than we expected, and won’t come close to ending the border catastrophe the President has created. As the lead Democrat negotiator proclaimed: Under this legislation, ‘the border never closes.’”

Johnson, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA), House Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik (R-NY), and House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN) said in a written statement:
 

House Republicans oppose the Senate immigration bill because it fails in every policy area needed to secure our border and would actually incentivize more illegal immigration.

Among its many flaws, the bill expands work authorizations for illegal aliens while failing to include critical asylum reforms. Even worse, its language allowing illegals to be “released from physical custody” would effectively endorse the Biden “catch and release” policy.

The so-called “shutdown” authority in the bill is anything but, riddled with loopholes that grant far too much discretionary authority to Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas — who has proven he will exploit every measure possible, in defiance of the law, to keep the border open.

The bill also fails to adequately stop the President’s abuse of parole authority and provides for taxpayer funds to fly and house illegal immigrants in hotels through the FEMA Shelter and Services Program.

Because President Biden has refused to utilize his broad executive authority to end the border catastrophe that he has created, the House led nine months ago with the passage of the Secure the Border Act (H.R. 2). That bill contains the necessary components to actually stem the flow of illegals and end the present crisis. The Senate must take it up immediately.

America’s sovereignty is at stake.

[End statement]

“Any consideration of this Senate bill in its current form is a waste of time. It is DEAD on arrival in the House. We encourage the U.S. Senate to reject it,” the leaders added.

Fischer Column: Show Iran U.S. means business

Read the full column by Senator Fischer on kearneyhub.com

In 1988, the American frigate USS Samuel B. Roberts struck an Iranian mine in international waters. The explosion severely damaged the boat and injured several Americans. Thankfully, no one was killed — but wisely, President Reagan didn’t wait for tragedy to occur before acting.

Just four days later, the United States launched Operation Praying Mantis. Our Navy destroyed two Iranian oil platforms, three warships, two fighter jets, and multiple other vessels.

President Reagan’s message was clear: If you put American lives in danger, you will be destroyed. In response to Operation Praying Mantis, there was no escalation. The conflict did not spiral into an uncontained war, and deterrence was restored.

Compare that powerful and effective example of deterrence to where we are today. Another Iran-backed group, Hamas, attacked our ally Israel on Oct. 7. After the attack, President Biden promised that the United States would stand with Israel. He promised he would not tell Israel how to conduct its war against this terror, and that Israel could make its own decisions as a sovereign nation.

But since Oct. 7, the Biden administration has all but folded to the demands of those in his party who want to condition aid and support to our ally. And after Oct. 7, the president didn’t only fail Israel — he failed America’s military.

In the four months after Oct. 7, Iran-backed militias attacked U.S. troops not once, not twice — but more than 150 times. Biden allowed not days, not weeks, but months of unanswered attacks by Iran-backed Houthis on U.S. ships and civilian cargo vessels in the Red Sea.

What was the inevitable result of the president’s hesitation? The tragic deaths of three American troops at the hands of an Iran-backed militia, with dozens more seriously injured in the same drone attack. And just days earlier, two Navy SEALS gave their lives trying to stop Iran from supplying weapons to militia groups just like the one responsible for the drone attack.

Those deaths add to a tally of at least 31 Americans killed in Israel on Oct. 7, not to mention the Americans still being held hostage in Gaza.

The Biden administration repeatedly says that it doesn’t want to escalate the situation in the Middle East. The administration has said it wants to avoid escalation so much that it’s beginning to seem like Biden is more afraid of being blamed for escalation than he’s afraid of Americans being killed.

But we should be clear: In the months following Oct. 7, President Biden failed to deter Iran’s support for terror, and he failed to deter attacks by the groups Iran supports. Ultimately, the only attacks Biden deterred were our own.

Nearly a week after the tragic deaths of these servicemembers, the president ordered airstrikes on seven sites in Iraq and Syria connected to militia groups and Iranian forces. While these strikes might temporarily degrade some of Iran’s capability in the region, the regime’s proxy organizations — including the Houthis — continue to attack U.S. forces and commercial ships.

The U.S. also warned for days where these attacks would happen, which no doubt allowed our enemies to prepare and escape. Again, Biden’s response was too little, too late.

Rural Radio: Fischer, Ricketts oppose negotiated bill on border security, Ukraine and Israel funding

Read the full article by Scott Miller on ruralradio.com

Nebraska’s U.S. Senatorial delegation will not be among those supporting the National Security Supplemental bill containing new money and Presidential authority for border security, as well as billions in funding for Ukraine and Israel.

Both Deb Fischer and Pete Ricketts have come out against the compromise legislation, details of which were finally released late Sunday by Democrat Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.

In her statement, Fischer said she cannot vote for a bill that funds the security of other nations while leaving our own border security in jeopardy.

In his, Ricketts said any legislation must force border security and stop mass parole of illegal aliens, but instead, the lead Democrat negotiator is boasting about how under this bill the ‘border never closes.’

Schumer has scheduled a vote on the measure Wednesday, but has said it would be called off if it was clear the measure did not have the support of 60 or more Senators, which would be needed to invoke cloture and force a vote on the bill.

FISCHER and HICKENLOOPER OP-ED – A call to secure our cell towers from Chinese spying

Read the full op-ed by U.S. Senators Deb Fischer and John  Hickenhooper on thehill.com

Last year, Americans were shocked when a Chinese surveillance balloon flew coast-to-coast over the entire United States. The balloon caused a public frenzy of concern about why China was spying and what classified secrets they might have found. 

But the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been spying on us for over a decade in a much subtler way. Their surveillance tool of choice? Our cell towers. 

Over the past several years, Chinese companies like Huawei and ZTE have infiltrated our communications networks by selling their equipment to providers at artificially cheap prices. Over time, this has enabled Huawei and ZTE to significantly expand their equipment’s presence in networks throughout the rural United States. For providers in rural areas operating on slimmer margins, cheap gear was a welcome option, and the risks associated with that gear were not yet well known.  

But these same rural areas, including in our home states of Nebraska and Colorado, also host several military bases and nuclear missile silos. Our intelligence agencies identified a pattern: communications providers were installing Chinese-made equipment on mobile wireless towers right next to American military assets. This made our domestic and defense communications vulnerable to Chinese espionage, since, under Chinese law, the CCP can compel companies to hand over their data records with little justification. 

In 2020, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) responded to this national security threat by banning the purchase of any Huawei or ZTE equipment. That same year, Congress passed the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act to create a $1.9 billion reimbursement program to financially help eligible communications companies afford the costs to remove at-risk equipment and replace it — a process referred to as “Rip and Replace.” 

These responses were important steps forward, but today, much of this Chinese gear remains in place.  

Approximately 24,000 pieces of equipment still operate in 8,400 different locations near U.S. homes, small businesses, interstate highways, and university campuses. Nearly all of the 85 companies that received approval by the FCC for costs to rip and replace the untrusted equipment are still waiting for their full federal reimbursement. Communications providers, many of them smaller companies, can’t pay to replace these technologies without help. 

It’s a vicious circle. Now, the FCC’s Rip and Replace Program faces a budget shortfall and communications providers simply do not have enough money to replace Chinese-made gear as mandated. That means they’ll either refrain from ripping it out or will be forced to shut down parts or all of their networks. And this is already beginning.  

Essential communications service in the most rural areas is the first to go dark. Without swift action by Congress, thousands of Americans could lose their current mobile and landline phone services — services that are essential for work, emergencies and life in the 21st century. 

That’s why we introduced the bipartisan Defend Our Networks Act. We need telecom companies to remove China’s surveillance infrastructure and replace it with secure equipment, but we can’t force these critical businesses to go broke in the process. 

The Defend Our Networks Act would remove dangerous Chinese equipment and secure rural communications without network disruptions — all using funding already expended by Congress. 

Chinese telecommunications equipment in U.S. networks is a sobering surveillance threat. The urgency of its removal cannot be understated. We did the right thing when Congress established the Rip and Replace Program at the FCC. It’s time we finish the job by passing the Defend Our Networks Act — before it is too late. 

Sens. John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.) and Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) both serve on the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. 

Rural Radio – Fischer responds to attacks against U.S. troops

Read the press release on ruralradio.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, released the following statement today following the reports of attacks on U.S. troops that resulted in the death of three service members—leaving others wounded:

“Years of placating Iran have only enriched Tehran and emboldened the regime’s proxies—now three American troops lie dead. For the safety of our troops and to honor those fallen, the Biden administration must make Iran’s regime pay a heavy price.”

Tensions in the Middle East escalating as the Biden administration’s efforts have so far failed to end attacks on Western military and commercial resources in the region. The president’s national security team meeting today as Biden says “we shall respond” to the attacks by the Iran-backed militias that killed three and injured more than 30 U.S. troops in Jordan on Sunday. The president saying the U.S. “will hold all those responsible to account,” despite previously downplaying the Iran threat – saying Tehran “knows not to do anything.” All this as there’s still no breakthrough in talks between the U.S. and China on threats to Red Sea shipping routes, and as sanctions against Iran and the Houthis have yet to deter their aggression.

1011 NOW – Sen. Deb Fischer and Sen. Angus King to introduce bill expanding access to paid family leave

Read the full article on 1011now.com

LINCOLN, Neb. (KOLN) – U.S. Senators Deb Fischer of Nebraska and Sen. Angus King of Maine will introduce the Paid Family and Medical Leave Tax Credit Extension and Enhancement Act this week.

According to a press release by Sen. Fisher’s office, by making the Paid Family and Medical Leave Employer Tax Credit permanent, the legislation makes it easier for businesses of any size to offer PFML plans to employees.

Senators Fischer and King led the effort to establish the country’s first ever nationwide PFML policy, which was included in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and implemented in 2018.

“Americans shouldn’t have to choose between making ends meet and taking care of family—that’s why Senator King and I passed the first ever nationwide paid family leave law,” Sen. Fischer said. “Now, we need to make that legislation permanent and expand access to paid family leave. Our new bill will encourage more businesses to offer paid family leave to more working Americans.”

The Senators’ legislation builds on the 2017 law to better include working families and hourly workers. The legislation also provides additional options for businesses to earn the paid leave tax credit, such as paying for PFML insurance products, and it requires greater outreach efforts to raise awareness about the credit.

“I have often said that Maine is one big town—big community—with long roads,” Sen. King said. “And when a member of our community is hurting, we drop everything to take care of our own. However, no one should have to choose between caring for our families or receiving the next paycheck to put food on the table. That’s why I’ve been working with my Republican colleague, Deb Fischer of Nebraska, to introduce the Paid Family and Medical Leave Tax Credit Extension and Enhancement Act which makes the PFML tax credit permanent. By making this extension permanent on a bipartisan basis, we’re prioritizing people over politics –and supporting those who care for one another in times of need.”

1011 NOW – Senator Deb Fischer seeking third term in Senate

Read the full piece by Abigail Carrera on 1011now.com

LINCOLN, Neb. (KOLN) – Senator Deb Fischer is seeking a third term in the United States Senate.

Senator Deb Fischer announced she filed for re-election with Nebraska’s Secretary of State on Monday. She said she’s received more than 1,000 endorsements on the local, state, and federal levels.

Currently, Fischer does not have any challengers that have filed.

Shopping Basket

Help us fight for the good life.

By entering by information, I understand that I will recieve emails & updates about Deb Fischer for U.S. Senate. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out at any time. Refer to our Privacy Policy.

Deb listening to supporter